A simple performance comparison between CDS redirect and normal read

Created by Wang, Jerry, last modified on Jan 05, 2017

A very rough performance comparison is performed in ER9/001.

Comparison scenario

The two below operations are compared:

table ZCOMM_PRODUCT2

This is a very simple table which has only three fields. All of the fields are mapped from MARA.

A simple performance comparison between CDS redirect and normal read

table ZCOMM_PRODUCT which is redirected to CDS view ZP_MARA_REDIRECT

A simple performance comparison between CDS redirect and normal read

Both table have exactly the same number of entries: 97.144

I create two simple ABAP methods to retrieve data from ZCOMM_PRODUCT and ZCOMM_PRODUCT2:

A simple performance comparison between CDS redirect and normal read
A simple performance comparison between CDS redirect and normal read

And use ST05 to trace the duration of these two kinds of SELECT SQL.

Test result

The case for direct read via SELECT SQL: 0.159 second
The case for CDS redirect: 0.247 second

A simple performance comparison between CDS redirect and normal read

要获取更多Jerry的原创文章,请关注公众号"汪子熙":
A simple performance comparison between CDS redirect and normal read