chrome复制窗口_复制网站的Chrome应用有什么好处？
chrome复制窗口
There are quite a few web apps for Chrome that seem to be nothing more than ‘prettified’ shortcuts to our favorite websites, but is that all they are, or is there more to them? Today’s SuperUser Q&A post has the answers.
Chrome浏览器中有许多Web应用程序似乎不过是我们喜欢的网站的“美化”快捷方式，而仅仅是它们的全部，还是还有更多？ 今天的“超级用户问答”帖子已经给出了答案。
Today’s Question & Answer session comes to us courtesy of SuperUser—a subdivision of Stack Exchange, a community-driven grouping of Q&A web sites.
今天的“问答”环节由SuperUser提供，它是Stack Exchange的一个分支，该社区是由社区驱动的Q＆A网站分组。
问题 (The Question)
SuperUser reader kolypto wants to know what, if any, benefits there are to installing Chrome apps that duplicate a website:
超级用户阅读器kolypto想要知道安装复制网站的Chrome应用有什么好处(如果有)：
There are a number of Chrome apps that seem to be nothing more than shortcuts to various web services. Some examples are:
许多Chrome应用似乎不过是各种Web服务的快捷方式。 一些例子是：
They do not seem to add or modify any features outside of placing a shortcut on the “Apps” page. Are there any reasons for installing these? What do they actually do?
除了在“应用程序”页面上放置快捷方式外，他们似乎没有添加或修改任何功能。 有什么理由安装这些吗？ 他们实际上是做什么的？
Are these types of Chrome apps merely ‘prettified’ shortcuts, or is there more to them than we are aware of?
这些类型的Chrome应用程序仅仅是“美化”的快捷方式，还是它们所包含的内容超出我们所知？
答案 (The Answer)
SuperUser contributor joejoe31b has the answer for us:
超级用户贡献者joejoe31b为我们提供了答案：
This Google Developer page details the differences between hosted and packaged apps. In a nutshell, the main difference between them is that hosted apps are the ones you are thinking of (ones that display a hosted website), and packaged apps are apps that are more self-contained (and include most, if not all, of their HTML and CSS files, or resources).
这个Google Developer页面详细介绍了托管应用和打包应用之间的区别。 简而言之，它们之间的主要区别是托管应用程序是您正在考虑的应用程序(显示托管网站的应用程序)，而打包应用程序是更独立的应用程序(包括大多数(如果不是全部)其HTML和CSS文件或资源)。
On the WrongPlanet forums, there was an interesting page here that describes some of the reasons why a developer might make a hosted app. One reason that ‘Apple in my Eye‘ pointed out was:
在WrongPlanet论坛上，出现了一个有趣的页面在这里描述的一些为什么开发商可能使托管应用程序的原因。 “我眼中的苹果”指出的原因之一是：
- It may be a website technically, but it functions indistinguishably from a normal non-web browser app. Also, turning it into a shortcut strips away all the irrelevant browser controls so that it looks like a normal app window. 从技术上讲，它可能是一个网站，但其功能与普通的非Web浏览器应用程序并无区别。 同样，将其转换为快捷方式也会删除所有不相关的浏览器控件，从而使其看起来像普通的应用程序窗口。
‘NeantHumain‘ continued the discussion by saying:
“ NeantHumain ”继续讨论，说：
- Google Chrome apps are just web apps written in HTML5 that take advantage of new features like: canvas, video, SVG, WebGL, and a bunch of new APIs that can be accessed through JavaScript. They can be used for everything from geo-location, offline storage, and/or web workers for a sort of multithreading. Google Chrome应用程序只是用HTML5编写的网络应用程序，它们利用了诸如画布，视频，SVG，WebGL以及可以通过JavaScript访问的许多新API之类的新功能。 它们可以用于地理位置，脱机存储和/或Web工作者等所有类型的多线程。
So, in other words, it seems that more goes on in the background of a hosted app than just displaying a webpage. It allows the developer to extend the functionality of the website, and bypass some of the restrictions that a normal website may encounter.
因此，换句话说，似乎在托管应用程序的后台发生的不仅仅是显示网页。 它允许开发人员扩展网站的功能，并绕开普通网站可能遇到的一些限制。
Have something to add to the explanation? Sound off in the comments. Want to read more answers from other tech-savvy Stack Exchange users? Check out the full discussion thread here.
有什么补充说明吗？ 在评论中听起来不错。 是否想从其他精通Stack Exchange的用户那里获得更多答案？ 在此处查看完整的讨论线程。
翻译自: https://www.howtogeek.com/189144/what-are-the-benefits-of-chrome-apps-that-duplicate-a-website/
chrome复制窗口