为什么说不支持浏览器_您说什么：如何在家中安全地浏览？

为什么说不支持浏览器

Responses to this week’s Ask the Reader question show that just because you’re away from home doesn’t mean you have to give up the security and privacy that your home network provides.

对本周“问读者”问题的回答表明，仅因为您不在家里并不意味着您必须放弃家庭网络所提供的安全性和隐私性。

Earlier this week we asked you to share you browsing away from home security tips and tricks and obliged. JC offered one of the more entertaining tales of away-from-home browsing:

本周早些时候，我们要求您与您分享一些远离家庭安全的提示和技巧，并且必须遵守。 JC提供了更有趣的外出浏览故事之一：

Recently a bunch of us stayed at a high end resort down in Mexico. Internet was offered as a pay per device service at about $80/week/device. Considering we had about 12 wifi devices there among us(a few geeks), I decided to plan ahead. I setup a WRT54G as a WiFi client with a v*n back to my house and NAT. Setup a second one as a basic wireless access point with password and plugged it into the first.

最近，我们一群人住在墨西哥的一个高端度假胜地。 互联网是按设备服务付费的，大约每台设备每周80美元。 考虑到我们中间有大约12个wifi设备(一些极客)，我决定提前计划。 我将WRT54G设置为带有v*n的WiFi客户端，并返回到我的房屋和NAT。 将第二个设置为带有密码的基本无线访问点，并将其插入第一个。

Onsite we setup the devices and connected to the wireless with one paid account(tied to the MAC address). Everyone connected to the other device for wireless access and it was all tunnelled through my home network with encryption.

在现场，我们设置设备并通过一个付费帐户(与MAC地址绑定)连接到无线网络。 每个人都连接到另一台设备以进行无线访问，并且所有设备都通过我的家庭网络进行了加密传输。

Next time, I will have a WAN side proxy to allow devices to get on the WiFi network, not register with the access gateway, and use the proxy as the default gateway. This way we can use the wireless anywhere on the resort, not just in our room.

下次，我将具有WAN端代理，以允许设备进入WiFi网络，而不是在访问网关中注册，并将代理用作默认网关。 这样，我们可以在度假村的任何地方使用无线网络，而不仅仅是在我们的房间。

Paranoid, not really(in Cuba I was paranoid). I’m just cheap, paranoid was a simple addon to cheap.

偏执狂，不是真的(在古巴我是偏执狂)。 我只是便宜，偏执狂是廉价的一个简单附加物。

TheFu highlights how, despite your best efforts sometimes the Wi-Fi hotspot can thwart you:

TheFu重点介绍了尽管尽了最大的努力，有时Wi-Fi热点还是可以阻止您：

For quick access, an ssh SOCKS proxy to my home server(s).

为了快速访问，请使用ssh SOCKS代理到我的家庭服务器。

For longer needs, like an evening in a hotel, Openv*n.

对于更长的需求，例如晚上在酒店使用Openv*n。

If I can’t get either of those working, it is time to hit the hotel bar or watch some tube.

如果我不能任其工作，那么该到酒店酒吧或看些管子了。

Out of 7 hotels I’ve stayed in the last 3 months, only 2 allowed any v*n/ssh access. Hotels are deploying invisible web proxies to prevent bandwidth hogs. These are not compatible with ssh or openv*n. I’m amazed at the number of fantastic hotels that don’t have in-room wifi too. I always bring a tiny, usb-powered, travel wifi router now.

在过去三个月中我住过的7家酒店中，只有2家允许任何v*n / ssh访问。 旅馆正在部署不可见的Web代理，以防止占用带宽。 这些与ssh或openv*n不兼容。 我对没有客房内无线网络的超赞酒店数量感到惊讶。 我现在总是随身携带一个小型的USB供电旅行wifi路由器。

The proxies are a real problem.

代理是一个真正的问题。

Hisa tried the tunneling and v*n solutions others highlighted, but found them lacking:

Hisa尝试了其他人强调的隧道和v*n解决方案，但发现它们缺乏：

I have tried tunneling home and v*ns, but I could never get over the performance issues. So, prior to the Sprint hotspot for smartphones, I tethered. Now, I use the hotspot when I need it. It’s $30 for the month, but if you don’t use it the whole month, Sprint only charges you for the days you used it. And you can secure it too so no one else can hitch a ride. If I am feeling particularly paranoid, I will use TOR as well. Performance is great, even outside of the Sprint service area (thanks roaming – the minimal charges are worth it when your job depends on it). I had AT&T for a while and they had a similar feature though a bit more expensive but still well worth it.

我曾经尝试过建立家庭和v*n通道，但是我无法解决性能问题。 因此，在智能手机的Sprint热点出现之前，我就进行了束缚。 现在，在需要时使用热点。 这个月是30美元，但是如果您整个月都没有使用，Sprint只会向您收取使用该天的费用。 而且您也可以固定它，因此没有其他人可以搭便车。 如果我感到特别偏执，我也将使用TOR。 即使在Sprint服务区域之外，性能也很好(感谢漫游-当您的工作依赖它时，最低的费用是值得的)。 我有一段时间的AT＆T服务，他们有一个相似的功能，虽然价格稍贵，但仍然值得。

翻译自: https://www.howtogeek.com/115453/what-you-said-how-do-you-browse-securely-away-from-home/

为什么说不支持浏览器